Gastrointestinal manifestations of long-term effects after COVID-19 infection in patients with dialysis or kidney transplantation: An observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged symptoms after corona virus disease 2019 (Long-COVID) in dialysis-dependent patients and kidney transplant (KT) recipients are important as a possible risk factor for organ dysfunctions, especially gastrointestinal (GI) problems, during immunosuppressive therapy. AIM: To identify the characteristics of GI manifestations of Long-COVID in patients with dialysis-dependent or KT status. METHODS: This observational, prospective study included patients with COVID-19 infection, confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, with the onset of symptoms between 1 January 2022 and 31 July 2022 which was explored at 3 mo after the onset, either through the out-patient follow-up or by telephone interviews. RESULTS: The 645 eligible participants consisted of 588 cases with hemodialysis (HD), 38 patients with peritoneal dialysis (PD), and 19 KT recipients who were hospitalized with COVID-19 infection during the observation. Of these, 577 (89.5%) cases agreed to the interviews, while 64 (10.9%) patients with HD and 4 (10.5%) cases of PD were excluded. The mean age was 52 ± 11 years with 52% women. The median dialysis duration was 7 ± 3 and 5 ± 1 years for HD and PD groups, respectively, and the median time post-transplantation was 6 ± 2 years. Long-COVID was identified in 293/524 (56%) and 21/34 (62%) in HD and PD, respectively, and 7/19 (37%) KT recipients. Fatigue was the most prevalent (96%) of the non-GI tract symptoms, whereas anorexia (90.9%), loss of taste (64.4%), and abdominal pain (62.5%) were the first three common GI manifestations of Long-COVID. Notably, there were 6 cases of mesenteric panniculitis from 19 patients with GI symptoms in the KT group. CONCLUSION: Different from patients with non-chronic kidney disease, there was a high prevalence of GI manifestations of Long-COVID in dialysis-dependent patients and KT recipients. An appropriate long-term follow-up in these vulnerable populations after COVID-19 infection is possibly necessary.

Tocilizumab for treatment of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (ca-AMR) remains unclear. Tocilizumab (TCZ), a monoclonal antibody against IL-6, has been proposed as a therapeutic option. We reported our experience treating ca-AMR with TCZ either as the first line option or as a rescue therapy. METHODS: We studied 11 adult kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven ca-AMR and preserved kidney function (eGFR 57 ± 18) who were treated with TCZ (8 mg/kg IV monthly). All biopsies were prompted by abnormal surveillance biomarker testing with DSA and/or dd-cfDNA. Clinical monitoring included dd-cfDNA and DSA testing every 3 months during the treatment with TCZ. RESULTS: In this cohort, ca-AMR was diagnosed at a median of 90 months (range 14-224) post-transplant, and 4 of 11 patients had DSA negative ca-AMR. Patients received a minimum of 3 months of TCZ, with 6 patients receiving at least 12 months of TCZ. Dd-cfDNA was elevated in all patients, with a median 2.24% at the start of TCZ treatment. After 6 months of TCZ treatment, 8/11 patients had dd- cfDNA <1%, and 3/11 had values <0.5%. Among those who completed at least 12 months of TCZ, dd-cfDNA decreased by 29% at 6 months (p = .05) and 47% by 12 months (p = .04). DSA also stabilized and, by 12 months, was reduced by 29% (p = .047). Graft function remained stable with no graft loss during treatment. There was a nonsignificant trend towards proteinuria reduction. During the course of treatment with tocilizumab, two patients experienced moderate to severe infections. CONCLUSIONS: In our early short-term experience, TCZ appears to reduce graft injury as measured by dd-cfDNA and modulate the immune response as evident by a modest reduction in immunodominant DSA MFI. Allograft function and proteinuria also stabilized.

Beyond donation to organ utilization in the USA.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The deceased donor organ pool has broadened beyond young, otherwise healthy head trauma victims. But an abundance of donated organs only benefits patients if they are accepted, expeditiously transported and actually transplanted. This review focuses on postdonation challenges and opportunities to increase the number of transplants through improved organ utilization. RECENT FINDINGS: We build upon recently proposed changes in terminology for measuring organ utilization. Among organs recovered for transplant, the nonuse rate (NUR REC ) has risen above 25% for kidneys and pancreata. Among donors, the nonuse rate (NUR DON ) has risen to 40% for livers and exceeds 70% for thoracic organs. Programme-level variation in offer acceptance rates vastly exceeds variation in the traditional, 1-year survival benchmark. Key opportunities to boost utilization include donation after circulatory death and hepatitis C virus (HCV)+ organs; acute kidney injury and suboptimal biopsy kidneys; older and steatotic livers. SUMMARY: Underutilization of less-than-ideal, yet transplant-worthy organs remains an obstacle to maximizing the impact of the U.S. transplant system. The increased risk of inferior posttransplant outcomes must always be weighed against the risks of remaining on the waitlist. Advanced perfusion technologies; tuning allocation systems for placement efficiency; and data-driven clinical decision support have the potential to increase utilization of medically complex organs.

Immunogenicity and safety of two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination via different platforms in kidney transplantation recipients.

After kidney transplantation, patients exhibit a poor response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. However, the efficacy and adverse effects of vaccines based on different platforms in these patients remain unclear. We prospectively analyzed both anti-spike protein antibody and cellular responses 1 month after the first and second doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in 171 kidney transplant patients. Four vaccines, including one viral vector (ChAdOx1 nCov-19, n = 30), two mRNA (mRNA1273, n = 81 and BNT162b2, n = 38), and one protein subunit (MVC-COV1901, n = 22) vaccines were administered. Among the four vaccines, mRNA1273 elicited the strongest humoral response and induced the highest interferon-γ levels in patients with a positive cellular response against the spike protein. Antiproliferative agents were negatively associated with both the antibody and cellular responses. A transient elevation in creatinine levels was noted in approximately half of the patients after the first dose of mRNA1273 or ChadOx1, and only one of them presented with borderline cellular rejection without definite causality to vaccination. In conclusion, mRNA1273 had better immunogenicity than the other vaccines. Further, renal function needs to be carefully monitored after vaccination, and vaccination strategies should be tailored according to the transplant status and vaccine characteristics.

Our Pediatric Liver and Kidney Transplant Activities in 2021.

OBJECTIVES: In children with end-stage renal disease, chronic liver failure, or acute liver failure, liver transplant and kidney transplant are the most effective modalities for better clinical outcomes compared with other therapies. However, children are particularly susceptible to surgical complications, so pediatric solid-organ transplants should be reserved for centers with substantial experience and multidisciplinary expertise. Here, we assessed liver and kidney transplants performed at our center in 2021. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 3, 1975, to December 31, 2021, we performed 701 liver transplants and 3290 kidney transplants. From January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021, we performed 21 liver transplants (19 in children) and 114 kidney transplants (12 in children). We recorded age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, etiologies, laboratory values, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: For the year 2021, we performed 19 pediatric liver transplants and 12 pediatric kidney transplants. Mean age of liver recipients was 3.4 years, and 8 were male patients. The most common etiology was biliary atresia (n = 7). All liver grafts were from living related donors who were first-degree (n = 16) or second- degree (n = 3) relatives of the recipients. Mean hospital stay was 17.6 days. All but 2 liver transplant recipients were discharged successfully (2 died from sepsis in the early postoperative period). Mean age of kidney transplant recipients was 14.1 years, and 4 were male patients. The most common etiology was vesicoureteral reflux (n = 3). One kidney graft was from a deceased donor, with the rest from living related donors who were first-degree relatives of the recipients (n = 11; mother for 8 recipients and father for 3 recipients). Mean hospital stay was 4.3 days. All kidney transplant recipients were discharged successfully. CONCLUSIONS: Solid-organ transplants for young children are often complex but can be performed successfully at experienced transplant centers.

Kidney Transplantation from a Deceased Donor with COVID-19 Ad26.COV2-S Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND Vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia is a rare immune disorder documented after adenoviral vector ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 (AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2-S (Janssen) vaccine administration against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. It is a rare adverse effect with an incidence of 1 case per 100 000 exposures. The disorder represents altered immune response with proliferation of antibodies that bind to platelet factor 4 (PF4), leading to formation of thrombi and consumptive coagulopathy. Thrombosis combined with thrombocytopenia generally occurs in the first month following vaccination and can lead to fatal outcome, even in young, previously healthy individuals. These young adults ultimately may become solid organ donors. The main concerns with vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia solid organ donors are anti-PF4 antibodies transmission potential, risk of early major graft thrombosis, and serious bleeding. CASE REPORT In our center, 2 kidney transplantations were performed from a single brain-dead vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia donor following Ad26.COV2-S COVID-19 (Janssen) vaccine in October 2021, which represents the first 2 cases of kidney transplantation from a deceased vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia donor after immunization with Ad26.COV2-S (Janssen) vaccine. Both recipients were closely monitored in the early post-transplantation period and after discharge from the hospital. To date, both recipients have a good functioning allograft, without any evidence of vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia transmission. CONCLUSIONS Our results are consistent with those of previously published cases of successful vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia donor solid organ transplantation. Kidney allografts transplanted from vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia donors can have a good overall function with favorable outcomes.

Kidney Transplant and Dialysis Patients Remain at Increased Risk for Succumbing to COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Immunocompromised patients have been at an increased risk of succumbing to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) since the beginning of the pandemic. METHODS: Here, we analyzed mortality and case fatality data from dialysis and kidney transplant patients, and compared each with an age-matched subgroup of the general population. RESULTS: We found that both patients on dialysis and kidney transplant patients remain at increased risk of succumbing to COVID-19 despite all available countermeasures. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses underline the need for additional protection for this vulnerable population.

Does Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 Levels Determine the Prognosis of Covid-19 Disease in Kidney Transplant Recipients?

BACKGROUND: In the normal population, a high monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) level is an important biomarker for the progression of COVID-19. This study investigated whether MCP-1 level can determine the disease prognosis in kidney transplant (KT) patients with COVID-19. METHODS: A total of 89 patients, including 49 KT patients (group 1) diagnosed with COVID-19 who required hospitalization, and 40 KT patients who did not have COVID-19 disease (group 2), were included. Demographic characteristics and laboratory results of the patients were recorded. The serum reserved for MCP-1 was stored at -80°C and studied blindly by a single microbiologist at the end of the study. RESULTS: While the mean age of the patients was 51.0 years (40.0-59.50) in group 1, it was 48.0 years (40.75-54.75) in group 2 (P > .05). In terms of the female sex, it was 36 (73.5%) and 27 (67.5%) in group 1 and group 2, respectively (P > .05). Similarly, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding primary disease and basal graft function (P > .05). There was a statistically significant difference in inflammation indicators in group 1 compared with group 2 (P < .05). A correlation was found between inflammation indicators and COVID-19 (P < .05). However, no significant correlation was detected between COVID-19 disease and MCP-1 levels in both groups (P > .05). Also, according to basal MCP-1 levels, we did not find a significant difference between survival and nonsurvival patients (164.0 pg/mL [146.0-202.0] vs 156.0 pg/mL [143.0-173.0], respectively (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Monocyte chemoattractant protein, an indicator of inflammation, was not found to predict the prognosis of COVID-19 disease in kidney recipients.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in kidney transplant recipients: clinical impact and outcomes - a single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplant recipients are a subgroup of patients at higher risk of critical forms of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and poor outcomes due to immunosuppression treatment. Herein, we present data from a single center cohort of kidney transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: In a prospective study, baseline characteristics, clinical features, antiviral and immunosuppression management were compared between outpatients and hospitalized patients, during a one-year period. RESULTS: Seventy-seven kidney transplant recipients were analyzed, including outpatients and hospitalized patients, with a median age of 57.7 (IQR 49.7-64.9) years. Twenty-eight (36.4%) were managed as outpatients, while 49 (63.6%) patients required hospital admission. Among hospitalized patients, 18.4% were admitted in ICU, 49% had AKI, and 20.4% died. Immunosuppression adjustments were performed in 95.9% of hospitalized patients, with dose of anti-metabolites adjusted in 83.7%, mTOR inhibitors in 14.3%, calcineurin inhibitors in 12.2%, and corticosteroid therapy in 81.6%. CONCLUSION: Among hospitalized patients, immunosuppression management included reduction or withdrawal of anti-metabolite and increase of corticosteroid dose. AKI occurred in almost half of patients and mortality in hospitalized patients reached 20%, reflecting greater disease severity than the general population.

Persistent SARS-CoV-2-specific immune defects in kidney transplant recipients following third mRNA vaccine dose.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) show poorer response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, yet response patterns and mechanistic drivers following third doses are ill-defined. We administered third monovalent mRNA vaccines to n = 81 KTRs with negative or low-titer anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody (n = 39 anti-RBDNEG; n = 42 anti-RBDLO), compared with healthy controls (HCs, n = 19), measuring anti-RBD, Omicron neutralization, spike-specific CD8+%, and SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires. By day 30, 44% anti-RBDNEG remained seronegative; 5% KTRs developed BA.5 neutralization (vs 68% HCs, P < .001). Day 30 spike-specific CD8+% was negative in 91% KTRs (vs 20% HCs; P = .07), without correlation to anti-RBD (rs = 0.17). Day 30 SARS-CoV-2-reactive TCR repertoires were detected in 52% KTRs vs 74% HCs (P = .11). Spike-specific CD4+ TCR expansion was similar between KTRs and HCs, yet KTR CD8+ TCR depth was 7.6-fold lower (P = .001). Global negative response was seen in 7% KTRs, associated with high-dose MMF (P = .037); 44% showed global positive response. Of the KTRs, 16% experienced breakthrough infections, with 2 hospitalizations; prebreakthrough variant neutralization was poor. Absent neutralizing and CD8+ responses in KTRs indicate vulnerability to COVID-19 despite 3-dose mRNA vaccination. Lack of neutralization despite CD4+ expansion suggests B cell dysfunction and/or ineffective T cell help. Development of more effective KTR vaccine strategies is critical. (NCT04969263).

A multicentre, patient- and assessor-blinded, non-inferiority, randomised and controlled phase II trial to compare standard and torque teno virus-guided immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients in the first year after transplantation: TTVguideIT.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression after kidney transplantation is mainly guided via plasma tacrolimus trough level, which cannot sufficiently predict allograft rejection and infection. The plasma load of the non-pathogenic and highly prevalent torque teno virus (TTV) is associated with the immunosuppression of its host. Non-interventional studies suggest the use of TTV load to predict allograft rejection and infection. The primary objective of the current trial is to demonstrate the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of TTV-guided immunosuppression. METHODS: For this purpose, a randomised, controlled, interventional, two-arm, non-inferiority, patient- and assessor-blinded, investigator-driven phase II trial was designed. A total of 260 stable, low-immunological-risk adult recipients of a kidney graft with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and TTV infection after month 3 post-transplantation will be recruited in 13 academic centres in six European countries. Subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio (allocation concealment) to receive tacrolimus either guided by TTV load or according to the local centre standard for 9 months. The primary composite endpoint includes the occurrence of infections, biopsy-proven allograft rejection, graft loss, or death. The main secondary endpoints include estimated glomerular filtration rate, graft rejection detected by protocol biopsy at month 12 post-transplantation (including molecular microscopy), development of de novo donor-specific antibodies, health-related quality of life, and drug adherence. In parallel, a comprehensive biobank will be established including plasma, serum, urine and whole blood. The date of the first enrolment was August 2022 and the planned end is April 2025. DISCUSSION: The assessment of individual kidney transplant recipient immune function might enable clinicians to personalise immunosuppression, thereby reducing infection and rejection. Moreover, the trial might act as a proof of principle for TTV-guided immunosuppression and thus pave the way for broader clinical applications, including as guidance for immune modulators or disease-modifying agents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU CT-Number: 2022-500024-30-00.

Comparison of Humoral Response in Kidney Transplant Recipients and Donors and Healthy Volunteers Following Second Dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine.

PURPOSE: To investigate the kinetics and durability of anti-spike glycoprotein (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG) after the second dose of mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients (recipients) compared with those in kidney donors (donors) and healthy volunteers (HVs) and identify factors negatively associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness in recipients. METHODS: We enrolled 378 recipients with no history of COVID-19 and no anti-S-IgG before the first vaccine and who received a second mRNA-based vaccine dose. Antibodies were detected using an immunoassay more than 4 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Anti-S-IgG <0.8, ≥0.8 to 15, and ≥15 U/mL were considered negative, weak positive, and strongly positive, respectively, whereas anti-nucleocapsid protein IgG was negative. Anti-S-IgG titer was determined in 990 HVs and 102 donors. RESULTS: Anti-S-IgG titers were 154, 2475, and 1181 U/mL in the recipient, HV, and donor groups, respectively, with values significantly lower in recipients. The anti-S-IgG-positivity rate of recipients gradually increased following the second vaccination, suggesting that recipients had a delayed response compared with the HV and donor groups, who had a 100% positivity rate at an earlier time point. Anti-S-IgG titers decreased in donors and HVs, whereas they remained stable in recipients, although at a significantly lower level. Independent negative factors associated with anti-S-IgG titers in recipients were age >60 years and lymphocytopenia (odds ratio: 2.35 and 2.44, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplant recipients demonstrate delayed and attenuated responses, with lower SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers after the second dose of the mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine.

First use of imlifidase desensitization in a highly sensitized lung transplant candidate: a case report.

Lung transplant candidates who are highly sensitized against human leucocyte antigen present an ongoing challenge with regards to finding immunologically acceptable donors. Desensitization strategies aimed at reducing preformed donor-specific antibodies have a number of limitations. Imlifidase, an IgG-degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes, is a novel agent that has been used to convert positive crossmatches to negative in kidney transplant candidates, allowing transplantation to occur. We present the first case of imlifidase use for antibody depletion in a highly sensitized lung transplant candidate who went on to undergo a successful bilateral lung transplant.

Collapsing Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis After Kidney Transplantation: Is It a Consequence of Viral Infections?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this case study was to explore the possible link between viral infections and collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (cFSGS) in patients who underwent kidney transplantation. METHODS: This case study included 3 case reports of patients who underwent kidney transplantation. The case reports were presented clinically and pathohistologically with cFsGS as a possible consequence of viral infections. RESULTS: The first patient developed cFSGS after polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV2 was positive twice. He gradually developed terminal stage chronic kidney disease. The second patient developed cFSGS with high range proteinuria after cytomegalovirus infection, which has been treated with 3 lines of antiviral medicaments. The third patient developed cFSGS as a possible consequence of hepatitis B virus infection. CONCLUSIONS: This case study highlighted the importance of viral etiology in the pathway of cFSGS. Pathogenic links between viral infections and concomitant glomerulopathies are challenging, especially in immunocompromised transplanted patients.

Humoral and cellular response after BNT162b2 vaccine booster in hemodialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Vulnerable populations, such as hemodialysis (HD) patients and kidney transplant (RTx) recipients, have priority for anti-COVID-19 vaccination, because of their impaired immune status. Here, we investigated the immune response after vaccination with BNT162b2 (two doses plus booster) in HD and RTx patients. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was started in two homogeneous groups of 55 HD and 51 RTx patients previously matched from a cohort of 336 patients. Anti-RBD IgG levels, assayed after the second dose with BNT162b2 mRNA, were used to stratify subjects into quintiles. After the second dose and after booster, anti-RBD and IGRA test were evaluated in RTx and HD, belonging to the first and fifth quintiles. RESULTS: After the second dose of vaccine, the median circulating levels of anti-RBD IgG were significantly higher in HD (1456 AU/mL) compared to RTx (27.30 AU/mL). IGRA test showed significantly higher values in the HD (382 mIU/mL) compared with the RTx (73 mIU/mL). After the booster, humoral response increased significantly in both HD (p = 0.0002) and RTx groups (p = 0.009), whereas the T-cellular immunity remained essentially stable in most patients. In RTx patients with a low humoral response after the second dose, the third dose did not significantly strengthen either humoral or cellular immunity. CONCLUSIONS: For HD and RTx, there is great variability in the humoral response to anti-COVID-19 vaccination, with a stronger response in the HD group. The booster dose was ineffective at reinforcing the humoral and cellular immune response in most RTx patients hyporesponsive to the second dose.

Low-solute hyponatremia in a kidney transplant recipient.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Electrolyte and acid-base disturbances are common in kidney transplant recipients, but there are few reports of low-solute hyponatremia or beer potomania in this population. We report herein a case of low-solute hyponatremia in a kidney transplant recipient with impaired graft function, highlighting key issues in diagnosis and management of low-solute hyponatremia, as well as exploring the pathophysiology of hyponatremia after kidney transplantation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old man who had received a cadaveric renal transplant 18 years before presented with symptomatic hyponatremia and seizure. Workup for an underlying intracranial pathology was negative, and subsequent biochemical workup suggested low-solute hyponatremia with potomania, arising from dietary modifications taken by the patient while self-isolating during the COVID-19 pandemic. Correction of hyponatremia was successful with conservative management with close monitoring. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates key points in the diagnosis and management of low-solute hyponatremia and highlights the pathophysiology of hyponatremia after kidney transplantation.

Clazakizumab for the treatment of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant recipients: Phase 3 IMAGINE study rationale and design.

BACKGROUND: Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a major cause of graft loss with no approved drugs for its treatment. Currently, off-label regimens are used, reflecting the high unmet need for effective therapies based on well-controlled trials. Clazakizumab is a high-affinity, humanized monoclonal antibody that binds interleukin-6 and decreases donor-specific antibody (DSA) production and inflammation. Phase 2 pilot studies of clazakizumab in kidney transplant recipients with chronic active AMR suggest modulation of DSA, stabilization of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and a manageable safety profile. We report the design of the Phase 3 IMAGINE study (NCT03744910) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of clazakizumab for the treatment of chronic active AMR. METHODS: IMAGINE is a multicenter, double-blind trial of approximately 350 kidney transplant recipients with chronic active AMR (Banff chronic glomerulopathy [cg] >0 with concurrent positive human leukocyte antigen DSA) randomized 1:1 to receive clazakizumab or placebo (12.5 mg subcutaneous once every 4 weeks). The event-driven trial design will follow patients until 221 occurrences of all-cause graft loss are observed, defined as return to dialysis, graft nephrectomy, re-transplantation, estimated GFR (eGFR) <15 mL/min/1.73m2, or death from any cause. A surrogate for graft loss (eGFR slope) will be assessed at 1 year based on prior modeling validation. Secondary endpoints will include measures of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. Recruitment is ongoing across North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. DISCUSSION: IMAGINE represents the first Phase 3 clinical trial investigating the safety and efficacy of clazakizumab in kidney transplant recipients with chronic active AMR, and the largest placebo-controlled trial in this patient population. This trial includes prognostic biomarker enrichment and uniquely utilizes the eGFR slope at 1 year as a surrogate endpoint for graft loss, which may accelerate the approval of a novel therapy for patients at risk of graft loss. The findings of this study will be fundamental in helping to address the unmet need for novel therapies for chronic active AMR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03744910 . Registered on November 19, 2018.

Optimal dose of rituximab in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical outcomes of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation have improved with the introduction of desensitization therapy with rituximab. However, rituximab prevents not only antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) but also increases the risk of adverse events, such as infection. For ABOi kidney transplantation in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers, we previously used a rituximab-free desensitization protocol and then initiated a single dose of 100 mg rituximab in 2016. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of ABOi kidney transplantation in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers before and after the introduction of rituximab. METHODS: ABOi kidney transplantations (n = 142) in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers between 2007 and 2021 were included. Patients were divided into two groups (with and without rituximab) for desensitization. The primary outcomes were the incidence of acute AMR and infection. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were desensitized without rituximab (rituximab-free group), and 76 were pretreated with 100 mg rituximab (rituximab group) before transplantation. The incidence of acute AMR was significantly lower in the rituximab group than in the rituximab-free group (.0% [0/76] vs. 7.6% [5/66], respectively; p = .047). Post-transplantation anti-A/B antibody titers were also lower in the rituximab group than in the rituximab-free group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events, including infections, between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In ABOi kidney transplantation patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers, the desensitization protocol with a single dose of 100 mg rituximab was effective in preventing acute AMR without increasing the risk of other adverse events.

Comparison of Thymoglobulin and Grafalon as Induction Agents in Renal Transplantation: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Induction immunosuppression is used to reduce the incidence of acute rejection and prevent delayed graft function. The 2 rabbit anti-thymocyte globulins- thymoglobulin and Grafalon (ATG Fresenius) have been commonly used for induction immunosuppression and treatment of acute rejection in solid organ transplantation. There are very few studies comparing the efficacy and side effects of both the anti-thymocyte globulins therefore this prospective study comparing the 2 types of anti-thymocyte globulins would be of clinical interest. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective single center study was conducted at Rabindranath Tagore International Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Kolkata, India from April 2019 to June 2020. Sixty-two ABO-compatible renal transplant recipients were included in the study. They were divided in 2 groups of 31 patients each. One group received thymoglobulin (3 mg/kg) and the second group received Grafalon (6 mg/kg). All patients were followed up for 12 months and the 2 groups were compared for incidence of rejections, infections, graft function, patient survival, and graft survival. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of rejections, infective episodes, graft function, posttransplant diabetes mellitus, graft survival and patient survival in thymoglobulin or Grafalon groups. The hematological parameters were similar in both groups at 7 days, 1 month, and 6 months of follow-up. The absolute lymphocyte count was significantly lower in the thymoglobulin group at 12 months posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS: Thymoglobulin and Grafalon were found to be equivalent in terms of safety and efficacy in short term, with no difference in rejections, infections, graft survival, or patient survival.